ISHS


Acta
Horticulturae
Home


Login
Logout
Status


Help

ISHS Home

ISHS Contact

Consultation
statistics
index


Search
 
ISHS Acta Horticulturae 682: V International Postharvest Symposium

DIFFERENT RESPONSE OF APPLE AND PEACH FRUITS TO 1-MCP: A CASE OF DIFFERENT SENSITIVITY TO ETHYLENE?

Authors:   V. Dal Cin, F.M. Rizzini, A. Botton, F. Ziliotto, M. Danesin, P. Tonutti
Keywords:   ethylene biosynthesis, ethylene perception, ETR1, endo-polygalacturonase, carbon dioxide, post-harvest physiology
Abstract:
1-methylcyclopropene (1-MCP) is known as an antagonist of ethylene action. A number of different trials demonstrated that not all climacteric fruits respond in a similar way to 1-MCP treatment: two examples are represented by apple and peach fruits. When applied on apples, 1-MCP is particularly effective in delaying ripening, while in peaches the rate of softening is slowed down only during the incubation period and a quick recovery of ripening parameters occurs in the post-treatment phase. In order to elucidate this different behavior, specific trials on peaches and apples have been performed. As expected, apple (cv. ‘Golden Delicious’ and ‘Royal Gala’) fruits responded to 1-MCP (0.625 ppm for 24h) maintaining firmness and producing little ethylene for the considered period (24 days) at 20°C, whereas in peaches (cv. ‘Summer Rich’), 1-MCP (1ppm for 24 or 72h) was effective in reducing ethylene evolution and slowing down the softening process only during the incubation time and a short period thereafter. The quick recoveries of ethylene biosynthesis and the softening process observed in peaches during the post-treatment phase are associated with increases of PpACO1 and polygalacturonase (PG) gene expression. A molecular approach was used to investigate the sensitivity of both apples and peaches to ethylene. ETR1 (a member of the ethylene receptor family) gene expression was monitored via RT-PCR and a different behavior between apples and peaches has been observed: in fact, following 1-MCP treatment, MdETR1 transcript accumulation showed a decreasing trend, whereas the amount of PpETR1 mRNA did not significantly change throughout the considered periods.

Download Adobe Acrobat Reader (free software to read PDF files)

682_35     682     682_37

URL www.actahort.org      Hosted by K.U.Leuven      © ISHS